By Mike Kroll

The lethargy and lack of vision of the Galesburg City Council is pretty clear for all to see with the exceptions of the two newest aldermen: Peter Schwartzman and Jeremy Karlin. Both of these gentlemen ran for city council last year because they wanted to implement change in Galesburg while the remainder of the city council seems devoted to preventing exactly that. The manifest frustration of both men is equally clear to witness at each and every meeting.

Some aldermen, like Ken Goad, Russell Fleming and Wayne Allen, are content to oversee the continued deterioration of city infrastructure and erosion of city services all in the misplaced aim of reducing the city tax burden. In the cases of Goad and Allen they also appear totally incapable of understanding even the simplest financial concepts as they relate to city finances or budgeting while Fleming is no such fool. In Fleming’s case he is a true Libertarian who believes that government should play as small a role as possible in people’s lives.

Alderman Wayne Dennis better appreciates the important role that can be played by government and the need to fund infrastructure and services but his good judgment is frequently clouded by desire to please every constituent and the erroneous assumption that the loudest voices are always representative of the majority of his constituents. His best instincts are too often undone by the constant vocal minority that oppose nearly all city expenditures or new initiatives.

Finally we have Alderwoman Corine Anderson. Like Schwartzman and Karlin she genuinely appears to understand the need for change and investment by the city but she is easily bullied and intimidated by some of the others. And, it is easy to fall prey to counter arguments against new taxes and fees, however necessary they may be, when you understand in your heart that many of your constituents are among the least able to bear the burden of these costs.

Getting something new done in the city is incredibly difficult under these conditions, particularly when you add a mayor with delusional political ambitions of his own and a fear of being overshadowed by his colleagues on the city council. Under the city manager form of government the mayor has very limited official powers and in fact should wield less statutory control over city operations than the aldermen. However, the mayor has near total control of city council meetings and the agenda for those meetings. In this way he can block or delay discussion of items he is not interested in pursuing. The mayor can also pick and choose who he will recognize at those meetings and how discussion is conducted.

So right now as our city faces a multitude of critical issues and decision points and a budget more fanciful than real the immediate need for prioritizing goals and objectives for the city is of manifest importance yet is being treated like a game without rules or supervision. The current year’s budget is not really in balance and the inability of some aldermen to comprehend how city finances work leads them to continually proposing counterproductive adjustments that pretend that unavoidable expenses can be avoided or delayed without incurring even higher costs for the taxpayers.

Real goal setting right now is necessary to distinguish necessary city services and infrastructure from merely desirable city services and infrastructure and the realistic prioritizing of the latter. Doing the absolute minimum to keep the city operational may appear to be desirable to those who disdain paying any taxes or fees but ultimately this approach will only continue or hasten the downward trajectory of Galesburg. This will necessarily be a painful process that cannot possibly please everyone but we no longer can afford the time to continue doing nothing.

If there is to be a future for Galesburg we need to not only regain real control over the city budget by setting realistic spending and revenue approaches — but we also need to schedule and prioritize goals for improving city services and infrastructure to make Galesburg a more attractive place to live and work.

This will not happen by accident or dumb luck and increasing revenues is unavoidable. But this also will not happen unless the existing Galesburg City Council members change their approach to governing or Galesburg voters change their membership just over one year from now.

Continued delays don’t make these tough decisions easier and they simply increase the costs of the necessary changes.

Mike Kroll

Editor & Publisher of GalesburgPlanet.com
Galesburg resident and owner of Dr. Mike Computer Therapist.

Married and the father of two adult sons.

MikeKroll@GalesburgPlanet.com

More PostsWebsiteFacebook

EmailFacebookShare

Related posts:

  1. EDITORIAL — Irresponsible Governing
  2. Credit card governing
  3. Governing for Dummies” might be good reading
  4. Youth could lead alternative to GOP (and Dems)
  5. Turning “vision” into “action”