By Bill Knight

Ten days ago, what was billed as the first debate among Repub­lican pres­i­dential candi­dates took place, and though Herman Cain had a good line, it was the familiar Ron Paul who seemed the most thoughtful and prin­cipled of the bunch. Like February’s Conser­v­ative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Wash­ington, however, the GOP’s estab­lishment seemed to scoff at the Texas Congressman and his backers, ignoring what some say is the most dynamic force that’s growing in Repub­lican ranks.

No, not the Tea Party.

Liber­tarians.

Besides Paul and Cain, the debate featured Gary Johnson, Tim Pawlenty and Rick Santorum, but they – and Fox News’ procurers for the Right wing – disregard both the grass­roots surge of libertarian-minded voters and also what Reason magazine editors see as a pivotal time.

We are in fact living at the cusp of what should be called the Liber­tarian Moment,” wrote Reason’s Nick Gillespie and Matt Welch, “the dawning not of some fabled, clichéd, and loosey-goosey Age of Aquarius, but a time of increas­ingly hyper-individualized, hyper-expanded choice over every aspect of our lives, from 401(k)s to hot– and cold-running coffee drinks, from life-saving phar­ma­ceu­ticals to online dating services.”

It’s partly a gener­a­tional divide pitting old, tired and extremist Repub­licans with young, vibrant and tolerant Republican-leaning youths too often derided as “Paulin­istas” or worse.

Most young Amer­icans have social consciences but don’t fight the tired, old “culture wars.” Their pref­er­ences are unpre­dictable; for example, “56% of young adults wanted health insurance coverage for all Amer­icans, even if that meant increased government spending,” according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

The gener­ation raised on the Internet has essen­tially been raised liber­tarian,” Welch and Gillespie said, “even if they’ve never even heard of the word. Native net-izens now entering college exhibit a kind of broad-based tolerance toward every manner of ethnic, reli­gious, and sexual-orientation grouping in a way that would have seemed like science fiction just a gener­ation ago.”

Paul’s 2008 pres­i­dential orga­ni­zation, the Campaign for Liberty, did well in fund raising, though the GOP estab­lishment convinced the corporate media he had no chance, so coverage faded to nothing. But his support continues. Not only did Paul win CPAC’s straw poll for the second consec­utive year, the Campaign for Liberty trans­formed itself into Students for Liberty, which quadrupled its campus chapters to more than 400 this year. They are a far cry from groups such as the Young Amer­icans for Freedom (founded in 1960 by disap­pointed Gold­water supporters) and the estab­lishment wannabes, the College Republicans.

At Western Illinois University, where I work, Students for Ron Paul became Students for Liberty – one of the first 30 U.S. chapters offi­cially recog­nized. Their orga­ni­zation summa­rizes its goals as “sick of war, scummy politi­cians and never-ending debt? So are we!”

WIU’s Students for Liberty pres­ident Tim Muto has said, “We are a nonpar­tisan group that believes the problems we face tran­scend political lines. It’s not about Democrats versus Repub­licans, or Right versus Left. It’s about right and wrong.”

Political parties and party loyalty dramat­i­cally changed since Democrats and Repub­licans solid­ified them­selves more than a century ago, and the Liber­tarian Party itself, formed in 1971, grew out of a sense of betrayal. Writing in the New York Times Magazine, Lewis Rossetto said, “Liber­tarians finally accepted the fact that they had been aban­doned by the liberals, used and misled by other radicals, and sold out by the conservatives.”

Ron Paul supporters aren’t reclaiming the Repub­lican Party as much as reject it, and both the Repub­lican Old Guard and the Tea Partying neocon­ser­v­a­tives miss the signs.

Neocon commen­tator Charles Krauthammer dismisses the fired-up youth as going through a phase – an unfair gener­al­ization. Appearing on Fox, Krauthammer said the liber­tarian movement is just “a lot of college students who want to be Ayn Rand.”

Bonnie Kristian, commu­ni­ca­tions director for the Young Amer­icans for Liberty, another Paul offshoot, told John Glaser of The American Conser­v­ative magazine, “All we’ve seen is ever-growing debt, war, abuse of our civil liberties, corruption, corpo­ratism, misery-inducing monetary policy, and general irre­spon­sible growth of government. It isn’t difficult for us to under­stand the two major parties do not have our best interests in mind.”

Crit­i­cizing Repub­licans’ fuddy-duddy Duds, Gillespie said, “When you look at the heart and soul of the party, what you see now is a party that is totally bankrupt, literally, figu­ra­tively, and spir­i­tually. So whoever are these Repub­li­canoid oper­a­tives that are being churned out by some college committee, the party they’re serving is either going to become more liber­tarian or die.”

In Reason, he and Welch wrote, “Politics, always a crippled, lagging indi­cator of social change, will be the last entrenched oligopoly to be squashed like a bug on the wind­shield of history, since the two major parties have effec­tively rigged the game to their advantage in a way no robber baron ever could.”

Bill Knight

Bill Knight is an award-winning jour­nalist, professor and deputy director of the jour­nalism program at Western Illinois University.

BillKnight@GalesburgPlanet.com

More Posts